The Swift Jobs Recovery Under Biden Will Have Long-Lasting Benefits for Workers – Center For American Progress

Center for American Progress

See all topics

Center for American Progress
The strength and pace of recent job growth demonstrates the importance of public investment at scale for minimizing long-term harm for workers and their families.
Building an Economy for All, Biden Administration, COVID-19, Economy, Jobs, Middle-Class Economics
Vice President, Communications
Director, Federal Affairs
Associate Director, State and Local Government Affairs
The economic crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic raised extraordinary challenges. Stemming the spread of the coronavirus required the shutdown of large segments of the U.S. economy and caused unprecedented changes to nearly every aspect of American life. Building off the lessons learned from the response to the Great Recession and motivated by the unique considerations of a global pandemic, lawmakers approved a massive federal response that protected the economic security of families and communities, mitigated the impact of the downturn, and—by enabling many workers to stay home during the bleakest moments of the pandemic—saved tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of lives.
The U.S. economy recovered swiftly and strongly from the pandemic-induced downturn, with employment surpassing its pre-pandemic peak in record time. By August 2022, the economy regained all the jobs that had been lost since April 2020.1 In contrast, it took 76 months for employment to reach its pre-recession peak after the Great Recession. Importantly, recent wage and job growth has been strong among those who fared the worst after the Great Recession: young, low-wage, and nonwhite workers. The labor market’s speedy rebound is important. Research on the Great Recession suggests that the subsequent slow recovery, with the economy taking years to return to full employment, not only inflicted pain on workers during those years, but also left scars. As discussed below, persistently weak labor markets following the Great Recession led to negative employment and earnings outcomes and widening inequality that continued long after the downturn ended.2
The emergence of high inflation in the United States and around the globe has sparked discussion as to whether pandemic relief efforts overheated the economy, fueling recent price hikes. The causes of rising inflation largely reflect problems on the supply side of the economy, including disruptions caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine, import bottlenecks due in part to the ongoing impact of the pandemic, and changes in consumer spending patterns due to the pandemic.3 Economists will debate the extent to which the magnitude of federal pandemic relief contributed to rising inflation. But while inflation has taken a real toll on the economic well-being of American families, it is critical to acknowledge the enormous short- and long-term benefits resulting from the federal response to the pandemic, which set the stage for a robust and rapid recovery, while providing a lifeline for families during the worst of the crisis. Overly aggressive action by the Federal Reserve to stem inflation at this point could induce a recession that could reverse the benefits of recent gains and cause greater harm to those who can least afford it.
This report reviews the evidence documenting the lasting harm, or scarring, associated with severe and lengthy economic downturns. It then contrasts the current recovery to that following the Great Recession, with a particular focus on indicators central to families’ economic well-being and on those populations most affected by the long-term consequences of the slow recovery following the Great Recession. This comparison shows that the lessons learned from the prior downturn regarding the importance of the size and structure of fiscal policy response, which informed the development of federal COVID-19 relief measures, helped fuel rapid job growth while protecting economic well-being in the wake of the unprecedented and pandemic-induced downturn.4 It is important to underscore that neither the pace nor the magnitude of the recovery was a foregone conclusion. The lingering impact of the pandemic and its related impacts on the economy had the potential to prolong the recession. Continued fiscal relief helped bolster demand and ensured that the recovery did not falter.5

Marc Jarsulic

Rose Khattar, Justin Schweitzer, Kyle Ross
The Great Recession, which lasted from December 2007 through December 2009, inflicted deep and lasting harm on the U.S. economy, workers, and their families. The crisis, which began in the financial sector and spread across the economy, resulted in 8.7 million workers losing their jobs and slowed wage growth, particularly for those at the middle and bottom of the earnings distribution.6 The downturn disproportionately affected young workers entering the labor market during the downturn, older workers nearing retirement age, and those who lost homes and/or savings due to the collapse of the housing market.
Policy inventions, including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act signed into law by President Barack Obama shortly after he assumed office, pulled the economy out of its free fall and helped spur an economic recovery. However, the infusion of federal funds was short-lived compared with past severe downturns, and, in 2011, budget reductions enacted in response to congressional Republicans’ demands significantly cut federal discretionary spending.7 Concerns over rising deficits prompted similar pivots toward austerity in other major economies.8 Together, these actions slowed the nascent recovery both in the United States and abroad. In the wake of the crisis, broad consensus emerged that the depth and length of the Great Recession was exacerbated by fiscal stimulus that was too small and too short-lived.9 As a result, the recovery took longer and was weaker than it might otherwise have been, causing more lasting harm that continued long after the recession formally ended.
During the past decade, researchers have examined the impact of the Great Recession and the effectiveness of policy actions designed to address it, drawing lessons that lawmakers could use to inform future policy deliberations.10 This research reaffirms the importance of fiscal policy as an effective tool for minimizing the depth and length of a downturn and for minimizing the risk of long-term harm to workers’ employment prospects and families’ economic security. Policymakers applied these lessons by enacting a robust fiscal response when the economy fell into recession due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including two major relief measures enacted in 2020 and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARP), enacted in early 2021. As this report documents, these decisive interventions were critical, not only in cushioning the impact of the pandemic and kick-starting recovery, but also in averting the kinds of long-term harms inflicted by the slow recovery from the Great Recession.
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a swift and sharp drop in economic activity as government restrictions imposed to limit the spread of the virus and protect public health shuttered businesses and kept all but essential workers in their homes. The 9.3 percent drop in gross domestic product (GDP) recorded in the first quarter of 2020 far exceeded that of all other downturns in the post-World War II era.11 Employment plummeted overnight—falling by 22 million—as large swaths of the economy shut down to minimize the spread of the virus.12 As a result of a combination of federal policies to protect families and businesses, and the gradual reopening of the economy, the COVID-induced recession was also the shortest of the post-World War II period, returning to growth in May 2020. By January 2021, nominal GDP had surpassed its pre-pandemic height. In contrast, it took more than twice as long for GDP to recover in the wake of the Great Recession.13
The effects of the Great Recession lingered long after the recession had formally ended, exacting a severe toll on American workers and the economy:
The length of an economic downturn is crucial because prolonged periods of unemployment can lead to a loss of the skills, experience, and connections that are fundamental to a worker’s ability to secure employment. In a seminal paper, economist Daniel Yagan documented the long-term impact of the Great Recession on workers’ earning and employment prospects and found that recessions can take a lasting and severe toll.23 Yagan tested a set of hypotheses to understand how and why the negative consequences of a recession continue once the economy recovers. He concluded that the lasting impact or scarring from an economic downturn is most consistent with a decline in human capital associated with long-term unemployment.24 His research, as well as that of others, underscores the importance of swiftly restoring full employment to limit the harm attributable to long-term spells of joblessness:
The Great Recession’s roots in the housing sector worsened its effect on the nation’s families. The combination of falling home prices, which left an estimated 1 out of 5 borrowers owing more on their mortgage than their home was worth, and battered household budgets due to the weak labor market led to widespread default.31 Ultimately, many families lost their homes through foreclosures, and some made early withdrawals from retirement accounts to cover basic living expenses after a job loss.32 Researchers estimate that the downturn reduced average family wealth by more than one-quarter, with young families and families of color experiencing the greatest losses. The wealth of middle-income and Hispanic families was hit particularly hard during the Great Recession and had not recovered by 2016.33 While income and wealth recovered for many families, albeit slowly, by 2016, the wealth of young families—those headed by someone born in the 1980s—remained more than one-third lower than would have been expected based on the experience of earlier generations at a similar age.34
A swift and substantial federal policy intervention, first in 2020 and subsequently in 2021 with the ARP, cushioned the economic harm of the COVID-19 pandemic and helped the economy move quickly to a strong recovery. Overall, federal actions infused $5 trillion into the economy—equivalent to 25 percent of 2019 GDP.35 Forecasters credit the speed and the scale of the response with its impact. Without a sustained policy response, the United States was at risk of a double-dip recession, GDP would have fallen much further, and unemployment would have risen much higher with the most severe toll imposed on low-wage workers.36 Moody’s Analytics credits the ARP with adding more than 4 million jobs to the economy in 2021 and speeding the pace of recovering all jobs lost during the downturn by a year.37 The structure of the ARP drew lessons from the Great Recession, with specific provisions designed to mitigate the factors that led to the lasting harm associated from the prior downturn:38
Child poverty, as measured by the supplemental poverty measure (SPM), which takes tax credits and noncash public benefits into account, fell to its lowest recorded level in 2021.40 The 46 percent reduction—from 9.7 percent in 2020 to 5.2 percent in 2021—lifted 3.7 million children out of poverty and is largely due to the expansion of the CTC.41 The divergence of the official poverty measure, which is based on pre-tax income, and the SPM demonstrates the importance of public supports. The official measure held relatively steady in 2021, dropping from 16 percent to 15.3 percent, in contrast to the substantial drop in the SPM.
Similarly, federal and state moratoriums reduced the number of households faced with eviction. While comprehensive national data are lacking, an analysis by Princeton University’s Eviction Lab estimates that there were 1.55 million fewer evictions than would normally have been expected while the CDC’s moratorium was in place.46 This reduction provided stability during a precarious period. Housing instability and homelessness has far-reaching negative consequences for children, including poor school performance and physical and mental health problems.47 Eviction also increases the risk of job loss, which precipitates a spiral of financial and economic issues for families.48
Figure 1
Figure 2
The student loan payment pause, originally enacted as part of the CARES Act and extended through the end of 2022, suspended loan payments, imposed a 0 percent interest rate, and stopped collections on defaulted federal loans.56 With the pause, the percentage of new serious delinquencies dropped dramatically over just a year from 8.9 percent at the beginning of 2020 to just 1 percent in the beginning of 2021—a rate that has remained low through to the present.57 While the job market for those graduating in 2020 and 2021 was weak due to the pandemic, it recovered quickly. The pause on federal student loan repayment, as well as a freeze on interest accrual, provided an important cushion for young workers that did not exist during the Great Recession.
In contrast to recent downturns, the benefits of the current recovery have been broadly shared and provide hopeful signs that any long-term negative consequences of the recent downturn will be minimal. By August 2022, the nation had regained all the jobs lost during the downturn, just 2 1/2 years after the downturn began. By contrast, it took more than six years to reach the same benchmark after the onset of the Great Recession.58
Figure 3
The unemployment rate for the labor force as a whole has fallen dramatically and is now near the bottom of its range during the past 50 years.59 Significantly, long-term unemployment—defined as 27 weeks or longer—as a share of the labor force quickly returned to pre-pandemic levels, minimizing the risk that workers would suffer a loss of the human capital needed to succeed in the workforce.60 As a result of tight labor markets, employment and earnings for nearly all groups of workers neared or surpassed pre-pandemic highs by May 2022.61 The pace and the breadth of the gains has minimized the period of dislocation where workers are at risk of falling behind. Notably, while workers who changed jobs immediately after the Great Recession experienced slower-than-average wage growth, the reverse has been true in the current recovery, with job switchers’ experiencing strong wage growth, leading some to call this the “Great Upgrade.”62
Importantly, groups of workers most affected by the scarring effects of the Great Recession have fared far better during the current recovery than they did after the prior downturn. By May 2022, the male unemployment rate had fallen below pre-pandemic levels, and by June 2022, the rates for Black women and white and Hispanic men and women were nearing where they were in February 2020.
Figure 4
Long-term unemployment, a critical risk factor for long-term scarring, posted a smaller rise during the pandemic than after the Great Recession and begun to return to pre-recession levels more swiftly.63 Black male long-term unemployment, for example, peaked at 3.5 percent in September 2021 as compared to a 7 percent peak after the Great Recession.
Wage growth, prior to adjusting for inflation, has also been strong across the earnings distribution, with the largest gains posted by those groups that fared worst after the last downturn—young workers, workers at the bottom of the earnings distribution, and workers of color.64 While inflation has raised the cost of living for American families, the strength of recent growth has provided a cushion against economic insecurity.
Figure 5
While the pace of overall job growth has been strong, labor markets have yet to fully recover, and some groups of workers—including women, particularly Black women, and those with lower levels of educational attainment—have lagged behind. The share of the total population employed remains below pre-pandemic levels.65 Moreover, while the unemployment rate for Black male workers has fallen below its pre-pandemic level, it remains nearly twice that of white male workers.66 And while private sector job growth has been strong—accounting for all of the net job growth since the start of the pandemic—public sector employment remains significantly below pre-recession levels.67 These workers’ progress could easily be stymied should the Federal Reserve push the economy back into a downturn with overly aggressive interest rate hikes before it has fully recovered.
The strength of the United States’ economic recovery shows the importance of robust public investment at a scale commensurate with the magnitude of the crisis for stabilizing the economy and setting the stage for a return to growth. The COVID-19-induced downturn posed unprecedented challenges, as efforts to protect public health made it impossible for the economy to function normally. Drawing on the lessons learned from past downturns, Congress acted swiftly and aggressively to cushion the shock to the economy, workers, and their families. The pace of wage and job growth confirms the wisdom of these efforts—as does the fact that the benefits of this recovery have been more equitably shared.
The authors would like to thank Rose Khattar, Christian Weller, Seth Hanlon, and Nicole Ndumele for their thoughtful comments on prior drafts, and Justin Fernando for fact-checking this report.
The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.
Senior Fellow, Economic Policy
Research Assistant, Tax and Budget Policy

Seth Hanlon, Lily Roberts, Andres Vinelli, 2 More Rose Khattar, Nick Buffie

the Center for American Progress

Lily Roberts, Topher Spiro, Maura Calsyn, 1 More Ryan Collins

Christian E. Weller

Alex Tausanovitch

William Roberts, Genna Cifelli

Kat So, Sally Hardin

Adam Conner
Center for American Progress
The Center for American Progress is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. Our aim is not just to change the conversation, but to change the country.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Learn about our sister organization, the Center for American Progress Action Fund, an advocacy organization dedicated to improving the lives of all Americans.
©2022 Center for American Progress


Leave a Comment