DMA – an opportunity for small platforms or a challenge for European legislation? – Lexology

Review your content’s performance and reach.
Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.
Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.
Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.
add to folder:
Questions? Please contact [email protected]
The fact that the last 20 years have been marked by the expansion of digital markets has undoubtedly contributed to the "enthronement" of leading companies in dominant positions all over the planet, created issues of effective competition enforcement regulations and the obvious need for more comprehensive and better regulation of the markets themselves.
The applicable regulations of the European Union (EU) have not proven to be effective instruments for the complex challenges of the modern age and the European Commission (Commission), being EU’s executive body, had to take certain radical steps towards proposals concerning both the creation of new and the modernization of existing regulations to create adequate answers to the hasty evolution of the digital world. The Digital Markets Act, i.e. Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on competitive and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives EU 2019/1937 and EU 2020/1828 (DMA) represents the embodiment of all the Commission's efforts in this sphere and after less than three years of consideration, the DMA will enter into force on 1 November 2022. However, its application will be postponed until 2 May 2023. This six-month, so-called transition period should enable the harmonization of the operations of all leading companies with DMA’s provisions and during its term, the Commission will not perform any actions contained in DMA’s provisions.
Before stepping into more detailed analysis of the most important DMA’s provisions, it is important to note that ratio legis is given in the very introduction of the Commission's proposal, where, among other things, is stated that digital services in general, and online platforms in particular, play an increasingly important role in the economy, providing new business opportunities in EU and facilitating cross-border trade. Precisely, the characteristics of digital services such as almost zero marginal costs for adding business or end users, strong network effects, the possibility of connecting a large number of business users with many end users, a significant degree of dependence among users, lock-in effects, etc. in combination with the unfair conduct of service providers can lead to a significant undermining and challenging of the core services of a certain platform as well as to endangering the fairness of the commercial relationship between the providers of such services and their business users and end users, a rapid and far-reaching reduction in the choice of business users and end users in practice, and finally, the provider of those services can be put in a privileged position of the so-called Gatekeeper. DMA aims to prevent the world's leading companies in the world of the IT industry from abusing their dominant position by imposing mandatory required behaviors that will guarantee the establishment of an open market.
Some of the most common core platform services provided by Gatekeepers are online intermediation services (Apple's Play Store or Google Play), online advertising services (Google ads), social network services (Facebook), the so-called online markets, cloud computing services (Amazon Web Services), online search services (Google Search), video sharing platform services (YouTube, Daily Motion), communication services (WhatsApp), operating systems (Android, Windows, iOS ), internet browser services (Google Chrome, Opera, Internet Explorer, etc.).
What is a Gatekeeper?
For a particular entity to be considered a Gatekeeper in the sense of the provisions of DMA, it must meet following conditions:
The seriousness of Commission's intention to regulate the digital market as adequately as possible is also reflected in the setting of additional, quantitative thresholds in order to facilitate the identification of a certain entity as a Gatekeeper.
A presumption of significant influence on the internal market exists if the entity achieves an annual turnover in the EU of at least EUR 7.5 billion in each of the last three financial years or if its global market value is at least EUR 75 billion in the last financial year and provides the same core platform services within at least three countries.
Furthermore, an entity is considered to provide core platform services important for the passage of business users to end users, if the core platform service has at least 45 million monthly active end users established or located in the EU and at least 10,000 active business users per year in the EU territory.
Finally, an entity is deemed to enjoy or will enjoy an entrenched and permanent position in its business if its core platform services have achieved all aforementioned conditions for the last three financial years.
In the case of meeting the above-mentioned conditions and thresholds, the Gatekeeper is obliged to inform the Commission about it without delay, i.e. no later than within two months from the day when the thresholds were reached. To such an entity, unless it proves otherwise, the Commission grants Gatekeeper status, which will be evaluated every three years.
Gatekeepers’ obligations and powers of the Commission
DMA stipulates a whole range of Gatekeeper’s obligations, which can be divided into two large groups:
i. obligations and prohibitions that must be observed without exception (provided in Article 5 of DMA), whereof, among others, the most important are the following:
ii. obligations that are subject to further specification by the Commission (stipulated under Article 6 of the DMA), which also include:
In addition to its status as the primary enforcer of the provisions of DMA, the Commission will also have broad specter of powers to sanction "unfair conduct" by Gatekeepers. If the entity, considered as Gatekeeper, does not comply with the obligations stipulated under DMA, the Commission is authorized to impose fines of up to 10% of the Gatekeeper's total turnover achieved in the previous financial year. Regardless of the imposed fines, the Commission may impose a new fine of up to 20% of the total worldwide turnover if the Gatekeeper repeatedly violates the same DMA obligation.
Additionally, if Gatekeeper continues to systematically violate DMA’s provisions, the Commission may prohibit it from merging with other entities for a certain period. Of course, the Commission also has several other powers such as to ensure compliance with DMA’s provisions, to request for information, market studies, inspection supervision, and likewise.
Critiques and expectations
Despite the growing number of critiques directed at this regulation, with main argument being "punishing the world's most successful companies for their accomplishments", DMA undoubtedly represents a rather ambitious and revolutionary undertaking designed with the aim of improving competition protection, establishing "fairer" market, and improving the consumers’ position as end-users of services. Hence, can be perceived as a long-awaited and much-needed "step forward" when it comes to the modernization of European legislature in the sphere of digital business.
Of course, in the upcoming period, the Gatekeepers, smaller companies looking to join the race, as well as the end-users of services will come across all the practical consequences of DMA’s provisions
add to folder:
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].
© Copyright 2006 – 2022 Law Business Research


Leave a Comment